Posted by: doublespeaks | November 20, 2010

A new planning policy for St Austell

Yesterday I attended the Planning Policy Advisory Panel. I do not usually attend this meeting but wanted to do so on this occasion. This was because they were to debate a vital piece of work that will be very significant to the St Austell area.

The policy was entitled -

Eco Communities Vision Statement/ St Austell, China Clay and St Blazey Regeneration Action Plan.

I won’t bore you with all the details now, if you want to know more you can view it here http://democracy.cornwall.gov.uk/ieListDocuments.aspx?CId=663&MId=2769&Ver=4

The key element for me was to establish a policy for St Austell and the surrounding area that means that any applications for development that come forward will have to meet certain criteria. These are:

To deliver the Community Strategy’s vision for Cornwall in the St Austell, China Clay and St Blazey Regeneration Action area development must demonstrate it;

  • Is transformational regeneration of the area:
  • of a large enough scale to bring about significant change.
  • achieving the highest environmental standards and quality of design.
  • raising communities’ aspirations and behaviour change.
  • maximising the number of trips by non-car means.
  • Delivers new jobs and economic growth at a minimum of 1 job per house;
  • Delivers infrastructure that meets the needs of existing and proposed communities, including affordable housing;
  • Delivers development that is environmentally, socially and economically sustainable;
  • Productively reuses previously developed or despoiled land;
  • Safeguards critical minerals reserve;
  • Maximise the opportunities to connect communities to the coast.

Basically this means that if this policy is adopted, any planning applications in the future will have to meet these standards before they will be considered.

Throughout all of my lifetime St Austell has suffered from development that has almost exclusively been about housing and little else. As a result the East part of the town is one of the most densely populated parts of Cornwall, yet we do not have the roads, jobs or community facilities to cope. Developers have been able to get away for too long with just building more and more houses without investing for the benefit of the people who will live there.

I was allowed to speak on behalf of St Austell and urged the panel to support this policy, however, I was quite disappointed that some local councilors where less than enthusiastic about this policy and at one point seemed to be arguing against it. But I am very happy to say that in the end the panel voted to recommend the policy to the Cabinet for adoption. This will now hopefully happen in January.

Clearly the background to this policy is the Eco-Town. But it does not mean the Eco-Town developments will automatically happen as each application for the numerous sites will have to be determined on their own merits. But what it does mean is that once in place we can put an end the endless building of houses without the investment in jobs, infrastructure improvements and facilities that we so desperately need. And that has to be good news!

Advertisement

Responses

  1. As you may be aware the government is currently consulting on a new homes bonus. This will provide match funding in council tax for each new home built for the following six years. How much depends on the banding, but a rough average might be £8,000 per home. The grant is not ringfenced so the council will be able to do what it likes with it. The reason I raise it is because I would like to see any such funds raised from homes built in St Austell ringfenced by the council for reinvestment in St Austell and not diverted elsewhere. I think this seems to fit with your views about infrastructure etc in St Austell. The link for the consultation document is here. I have also produced a summary, but don’t think I can attach documents.

    http://www.communities.gov.uk/publications/housing/newhomesbonusconsult

  2. A further comment. I have tried to look at the policy, but as I am using a dongle to access the internet at the moment, it is taking far too long to download and I’ve given up. It would be really helpful if the council separated out the various reports, rather than presenting them all together. This would be easy enough to do as they will have been separate before being put together in a pack, and it would make navigating them much easier. Similarly, the videos of meetings are a great idea, but they are often very long. If timings i.e. 60 minutes in for item xx could be given this would make viewing the aspects of most interest much easier.


Leave a Reply

Please log in using one of these methods to post your comment:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

Categories

Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.